|
|
|
|
|
That’s right. From the beginning we must not have a preconception (맞습니다. 선인관념은)
|
|
|
PAUL
|
2019-09-23 15:19:56, 조회 : 2,219 |
|
|
Paul Jang: (영문) ✝️✝️✝️
That’s right. From the beginning we must not have a preconception, that is, the Left and the Right. As the words of Jesus we can see them by the fruits of their words and works based on the results. Of course, the Left and the Right after the fall of Adam have been originated from Cain and Abel, and fatally gaining on the continuous history, and they will not disappear to the end of the world. Their conflict will be ceased only after Jesus comes again. Naturally man get a certain preconception by miscellaneous factors including an education. In order to overcome such a preconception, Plato suggested in his work ‘Allegory of the Cave’ that we must come out of the cave, and look at the things in the broader world, and Bacon also suggested in his work ‘Four Species of Idols’ (Idola Specus) that we must hold the ‘Nave’ of the man, and then we can rightly see the things.
Arranging this in principle, it is said that we must not contextually approach but ontologically approach and judge the situation. Because all men have a preconception, their judgement must be different according to the situation by the limitation of their knowledge ‘to be seen,’ ‘to be heard,’ and ‘to be experienced.’ This means that we must throw out the preconception, and empty their mind, and then can see the things of the world. Speaking in the way of Christianity, when we stand in the presence of God with empty mind (Job. 42:1-6), we can know our own mistakes, the relative righteousness of man to which they have held fast, and discover our true form. And make ourselves realize the absolute righteousness of God in the presence of God, therefore, we can repent our sins.
The preconception occurs in mind when we do contextually approach the whole thing. Man’s preconception must be taken form by working of many factors, that is, native place(hometown), regionalism, school relations, education, and reading. I think that it is the same as pattern in theology. When we do contextually or structurally approach, it must be far away from the Bible. Of course, if the contextual approach can prove the exact principle of the Bible, it is fortunate to us. But it is not so easy to do so. Even if we approach to it in the contextual logic, in fact, we must know that it presupposed the ontological approach (Matt. 25:34, 41, 46).
In conclusion, we must not be buried in the phenomenal situation which is appeared to the this world, and must discern between their right hand and their left (Jon. 4:11; 1 King 18:21). We must remove the evils and develop the things good, and show a clear-cut new vision according to the exposition by the principle of the Word of God. This is the reformed thought. Because all the things of the world, namely theology and church or even politics and culture are governed by the providence of God, I believe that we must evaluate history, and establish the vision through the truth of God. The Truth of God is different from the facts and the true facts that man says. The Truth, synonym for Jesus that is the Word of God (the Bible) judges the “facts” and the “real facts.” Of course, When the events through which the man’s eyes cannot understood would appear, it’s no surprise, even though feeling frustrated because we cannot understand the higher-level providence of God...✝️✝️✝️
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
선교운동소개
나눔의광장 